The National Baseball Hall of Fame formally opened in 1939 in
Cooperstown, New York. However, the concept
was established in 1936, and that year the Baseball Writers’ Association of
America (BBWAA) was tasked with voting for the inaugural class to be formally inducted
three years later. At the time, the BBWAA was only voting on 20th century
players, as a special Veterans Committee reviewed candidates from the 19th
century. For all the debate the Hall of Fame ballot causes today, it’s clear
that’s a tradition rooted all the way back with what occurred on the whacky
1936 version.
226 ballots with 2,231 individual votes were cast in the
1936 election. 170 votes were needed for election, and with no voting
restrictions and an average of nearly 10 votes per ballot, it’s truly
surprising that more players didn’t make it in that first time.
47 players received votes on the 1936 Hall of Fame ballot
but only five received enough votes for induction the first time around. The
inaugural class was comprised of Ty Cobb
(98.2%), Babe
Ruth (95.1%), Honus Wagner
(95.1), Christy
Mathewson (90.7%) and Walter
Johnson (83.6%). It’s shocking that given this group of titans of the game
that there were no unanimous selections, and a guy like Johnson and his 417
career victories received the vote totals of a fringe candidate.
For the surprise generated at the lack of unanimity on those
who did get in, the group who fell short may be even more jaw dropping. Because
some writers likely didn’t vote for active players (who were eligible) because
their body of work was not yet completed, I’ll only focus on the big name retired
players who fell short. Nap Lajoie
(64.6%), Tris
Speaker (58.8%) and Cy Young
(49.1%) were all well under the 75 percent of the votes needed. They all
eventually made it in but the fact they had to wait even a year seems odd now.
At the time, there were no restrictions on active or retired
status, so players who were still playing received votes. It’s important to
note that many writers did not consider active players on their ballot;
figuring that they would get their shot later on after hanging it up. Although
he was at the point of his career where he was a manager who only occasionally
put himself in games, future Hall-of-Famer Rogers
Hornsby was the active player who received the most votes with 105 (46.5%).
The most inexplicable former player to receive votes was
catcher Lou
Criger (seven votes or 3.1%). During a 16-year career between 1896-1912
with six teams (known primarily for his time with the Boston Red Sox), he hit
just .221 with 11 home runs and 342 RBIs. Best known for being the
defensive-minded personal catcher of Cy Young on multiple teams, he was still
considered one of the best at what he did during the Dead Ball Era. That being
said, it’s a bit of a stretch that he received as many votes as future
Hall-of-Famers John McGraw,
Sam
Crawford and Chief Bender
combined on the 1936 ballot.
Another surprise was first baseman Hal Chase.
While he was a fine player who was considered to have had the best glove of any
player at his position up until that time, he also had a long and sordid reputation as a
gambler and fixer of games, who was ultimately blacklisted from baseball
following the infamous 1919 Black Sox World Series (of which he was involved
through gambling but not as a player). He has the distinction of receiving the
most votes (11) on this ballot without eventually gaining induction.
At the time of the 1936 vote, banned players were not
excluded. Shoeless
Joe Jackson, himself an alumnus of the 1919 Series, received two votes, a
paltry tribute to his .356 career batting average. He would never appear on the
ballot again.
Pitcher Dazzy Vance
(one vote) and catcher Gabby
Hartnett (zero votes) were the two players on the 1936 ballot who had to
wait the longest to ultimately get in via the BBWAA, as they were finally both
elected in 1955.
In total, only seven players/managers who received at least
one vote on the initial BBWAA ballot did not gain eventual admission to the
Hall of Fame. They include Bill Bradley,
Kid
Elberfield, Nap Rucker,
Johnny Kling,
Jackson, Chase, and Criger.
Despite the oddities of the 1936 ballot, it is also fair to
surmise that writers didn’t have a blueprint from which to work when casting their
ballot. They were setting the bar with their first vote and determining the
criteria which would be generally use to measure all future classes.
Additionally, access to players was much different. Some writers likely never
saw many of the players on the ballot.
That all being said, there may not be prescribed results for
any Baseball Hall of Fame election but there are certainly anticipated
outcomes. Clearly, the tradition of annual debate and head scratching began
with the very first ballot and will likely continue into the future as long as
candidates continue to be picked in the current manner. Although some may
express frustration over the process, there’s no denying the amount of debate
and interest it infuses into baseball, which is never a bad thing.
********************************
You can check me out on Facebook or follow me on Twitter @historianandrew
Hey Andrew - seeing those initial vote tallies for the first five was fantastic and shocking.
ReplyDeleteLook... I can understand why there was some confusion over who the 3-5 players might be... but Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth were by far the greatest players (and maybe Cy Young, just looking at his numbers alone) of that generation.
Who did not have Cobb or Ruth on their ballot? I could see some voters not caring for Cobb because of the way he was perceived (racist or dirty player - it was THAT time in America, and dirty play... he played HARD... did he cross the line? Was it against the rules? Then he should have been tossed from games... but he wasn't. It was baseball... and everyone could have done it.
I love the sidearm sling of Walter Johnson... it's like he's always throwing from the stretch... but I could see how he wouldn't be unanimous... there were plenty of other great players and pitchers who could lay a claim to one of the three-remaining HOF positions.
Great historical article, Andrew. From time to time, I also enjoy your interviews with low-level ball players, but not always seeing as they have that Red Sox nation all over them. LOL!
Cheers, and keep up the great story-telling.